- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 16:56:46 +0200
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- CC: Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com>, Michaelâ„¢ Smith <mike@w3.org>, www-archive <www-archive@w3.org>
On 2012-06-15 16:48, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: >>> Opera is whether a raw "\" in the query component needs to be escaped. >> >> That's an interesting question, but again it's solely about error recovery >> ("\" is invalid in URIs). > > Apparently we must transmit "invalid URIs" over the wire then. That may be true, but I'm not sure what point you're trying to make here. >>> More than two slashes following an hierarchical scheme is another. As >>> I and others explained before, the RFCs leave a lot up to >>> implementations and that does not match what we need. We could try to >>> write something on top of those RFCs, but so far nobody has been >>> successful at that. >> >> Well, maybe it's worth trying. The other strategies that have been tried >> haven't resulted in a finished spec, either, right? > > Ian has tried to patch the RFCs in HTML. That was a mess. I am going > to try to obsolete the RFCs (at least to some extent). It was a mess, but not for that reason. Best regards, Julian
Received on Friday, 15 June 2012 14:57:16 UTC