- From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 15:54:16 +0100
- To: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
- Cc: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>, Peter Linss <peter.linss@hp.com>, Bert Bos <bert@w3.org>, Philippe Le Hégaret <plh@w3.org>, Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@myopera.com>, Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>, www-archive@w3.org
On Feb 7, 2012, at 15:15 , Daniel Glazman wrote: > We discussed this this morning during our current ftf meeting in > Paris. The general consensus is that it contains enough CSS- > and presentation-oriented features to remain in the CSS Working Group. > We of course understand it also contains an important API side and > we will be happy to see a joint effort between our two groups > work on Fullscreen. Any preference between having a TF, or having it discussed in either group? I tend to favour TFs for joint work, but I don't have a strong opinion. Either way, that would indeed lean towards inclusion in WebApp's charter. -- Robin Berjon Robineko (http://robineko.com/) Twitter: @robinberjon
Received on Tuesday, 7 February 2012 15:03:07 UTC