Re: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29

On Wed, 5 Dec 2012, Glenn Adams wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote:
> > On Wed, 5 Dec 2012, Glenn Adams wrote:
> > >
> > > Your position appears to be excessively cynical, and effectively 
> > > attributes bad faith to the WebApps editors trying to move the 
> > > process forward.
> >
> > I really see no value in what the WG is doing here.
> 
> OK, but don't be an impediment for those of us who do see value.

Um, no, it doesn't work that way. This is *actively harming the whole 
point of having a specification*. So yes, I plan to be an impediment.

Maybe you shouldn't be an impediment for those of us who see value in 
having a single canonical version of a spec?

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'

Received on Wednesday, 5 December 2012 21:28:07 UTC