- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2012 21:09:59 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
- cc: Edward O'Connor <eoconnor@apple.com>, www-archive <www-archive@w3.org>
On Wed, 5 Dec 2012, Glenn Adams wrote: > > Your position appears to be excessively cynical, and effectively > attributes bad faith to the WebApps editors trying to move the process > forward. I really see no value in what the WG is doing here. I also don't see any value in Process. I see value in getting interoperability (which this is actively working against), I see value in getting patent agreements (which this is not doing since that only happens at REC, and which the CG is quite capable of doing without the WG), and I see value in fixing bugs (which the original editors are doing but which the WG is not). -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Wednesday, 5 December 2012 21:10:23 UTC