W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > June 2011

continuing divergence in normative requirements and informative advice

From: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 12:35:45 +0100
Message-ID: <BANLkTimXDaFekGWyXsgmJHA5sEQSO0kajQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: www-archive <www-archive@w3.org>, Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>, Judy Brewer <jbrewer@w3.org>, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
There is a widening gap in between the W3C HTML5 specification and the
WHATWG HTML living standard especially in regards to accessibility

It would appear that there is currently no unified HTML standard that can
claim to be authoritative, we have competing documents that contradict each
other, so is it the case that authors and implementors pick and choose the
requirements/advice that best suits them?

What is the W3C doing to resolve the differences?

with regards

Steve Faulkner
Technical Director - TPG

www.paciellogroup.com | www.HTML5accessibility.com |
HTML5: Techniques for providing useful text alternatives -
Web Accessibility Toolbar - www.paciellogroup.com/resources/wat-ie-about.html
Received on Thursday, 9 June 2011 11:36:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:33:58 UTC