- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 22:12:57 +0200
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- CC: www-archive@w3.org
On 2011-07-15 19:49, Ian Hickson wrote: > On Fri, 15 Jul 2011, Julian Reschke wrote: >> On 2011-07-14 17:01, Jonas Sicking wrote: >>> ... True. I would be fine with removing the plugin requirement. Or >>> changing it such that it states that plugins can only be loaded if >>> it's done in a manner that ensures that all other requirements are >>> still fulfilled. Or just dealing with this once there actually are >>> plugins and plugin APIs which could be loaded while still fulfilling >>> the other requirements. ... >> >> Well, the spec is in W3C LC. So if we think this requirement needs to be >> rephrased then it should be brought up as a problem. > > If something needs to be changed, then it should be brought up as a > problem regardless. We have to fix problems whether the W3C is at WD or LC > or REC. I did in the meantime: <http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13267>
Received on Friday, 15 July 2011 23:00:08 UTC