- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 17:49:02 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- cc: www-archive@w3.org
On Fri, 15 Jul 2011, Julian Reschke wrote: > On 2011-07-14 17:01, Jonas Sicking wrote: > > ... True. I would be fine with removing the plugin requirement. Or > > changing it such that it states that plugins can only be loaded if > > it's done in a manner that ensures that all other requirements are > > still fulfilled. Or just dealing with this once there actually are > > plugins and plugin APIs which could be loaded while still fulfilling > > the other requirements. ... > > Well, the spec is in W3C LC. So if we think this requirement needs to be > rephrased then it should be brought up as a problem. If something needs to be changed, then it should be brought up as a problem regardless. We have to fix problems whether the W3C is at WD or LC or REC. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Friday, 15 July 2011 17:49:28 UTC