- From: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 16:40:05 -0500
- To: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
- Cc: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, www-archive <www-archive@w3.org>
On Tue, 2011-01-11 at 16:29 -0500, Yves Lafon wrote: > On Tue, 11 Jan 2011, Philippe Le Hegaret wrote: > > > Happy New Year to both of you! > > > > The Web Performance Working Group is going to publish today their > > Navigation Timing draft as a Last Call document. Deadline for comments > > is February 8, 2011: > > http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-navigation-timing-20110111/ > > > > We're messing up around with HTTP in this specification, by providing > > timing information related to DNS, HTTP, and HTTPS. > > Note that there are information in the HTTP RFC about time issues in > caches, > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-12#section-2.3.2 > is an example. So yes, there might be things to align there. Looking at the section, this does not seem to be relevant for the cache itself. I don't think it would affect us since we're not providing aging information but only timing. Thank you for pointing it out anyway. > I'll try to review this ASAP. Thank you! Philippe
Received on Tuesday, 11 January 2011 21:40:15 UTC