- From: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 16:29:59 -0500 (EST)
- To: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
- cc: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, www-archive <www-archive@w3.org>
On Tue, 11 Jan 2011, Philippe Le Hegaret wrote:
> Happy New Year to both of you!
>
> The Web Performance Working Group is going to publish today their
> Navigation Timing draft as a Last Call document. Deadline for comments
> is February 8, 2011:
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-navigation-timing-20110111/
>
> We're messing up around with HTTP in this specification, by providing
> timing information related to DNS, HTTP, and HTTPS.
Note that there are information in the HTTP RFC about time issues in
caches,
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-12#section-2.3.2
is an example. So yes, there might be things to align there.
I'll try to review this ASAP.
Thanks,
>
> It would be be great if someone with HTTP expertize could look at the
> specification and tells us (to public-web-perf@w3.org) how we're doing.
> Can one of you do this? I'd like to send also an email to the HTTP WG to
> advertise the specification as well, which list should I use for that?
>
> Thank you in advance,
>
> Philippe
>
>
>
>
--
Baroula que barouleras, au tiéu toujou t'entourneras.
~~Yves
Received on Tuesday, 11 January 2011 21:30:04 UTC