- From: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 12:37:37 +0000
- To: Ben Schwarz <ben.schwarz@gmail.com>
- Cc: www-archive <www-archive@w3.org>, ian@hixie.ch, Michael Smith <mike@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <AANLkTimba+v1aXcaX9dZDogJSu4NYYhZJx+FbcX-F22Z@mail.gmail.com>
thanks ben, will talk to mike On 22 February 2011 12:12, Ben Schwarz <ben.schwarz@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks Steve, I spoke to Mike regarding this earlier. > The current plan is that he will get in touch with you to pull something > together… longer term I plan to work on something with Mike, in person, in > Tokyo when I visit in July. > > Cheers, > > > Ben > > > On Tuesday, 22 February 2011 at 8:00 PM, Steve Faulkner wrote: > > Hi ben, thanks for the quick response, > > you wrote: > "I believe the title of the document / specification to be the most > relevantly accurate title possible, irregardless of the inclusion of > microdata. Although I'd be open to hear any suggestions for something > better?" > > a suggestion "HTML A technical specification for Web developers" > > Also can you provide an estimate of when the W3C spec-author-view will be > fixed? > > regards > stevef > > On 22 February 2011 08:22, Ben Schwarz <ben.schwarz@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Steve, > > I believe the title of the document / specification to be the most > relevantly accurate title possible, irregardless of the inclusion of > microdata. Although I'd be open to hear any suggestions for something > better? > > As for the W3C spec-author-view—I see it to really be the same as the > specification launched today. > I understand the differences between the two, but they're one and the same > in my opinion… (In the real world, people have a hard enough time working > out who the WHATWG and W3C are) > > I'd hope to port the new work over to the spec-author-view, but I do wonder > why the two need coexist, as the spec-author-view was a project that was > created by Hixie, Mike Smith (as far as I know). The goals of that > specification and mine are the same, I'd worked on both too… Personally, > I'd like to hear feedback from both Hixie and Mike on this… > > Rather than _porting_ anything, I'd be more interested in writing a global > W3C style guide & css package that could be included by all the willing > specification authors, to tidy the typography and generally provide a solid > pattern library for documentation. > > Thanks for your feedback, its always appreciated. I'm sure that this > project is only really just beginning :) > > Cheers, > > Ben > > -- > > On Tuesday, 22 February 2011 at 7:03 PM, Steve Faulkner wrote: > > Hi ben, great work on the developer document! > > I am a little confused though, the document is not a version of the HTML5 > specification (http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/spec.html) it is a version of > http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/ > So it should not claim to be "HTML5 A technical specification for Web > developers" It includes things such as microdata that are not in HTML5. > > On a related subject, the HTML5 Edition for Web Authors > http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec-author-view/ still has the color contrast > issues that were present months ago. At the time i provided a modded style > sheet which removed the issues. As I also suggested before, if you don't > have the time or inclination to update HTML5 Edition for Web Authors I would > be happy to take over. > > > > > > > > -- with regards Steve Faulkner Technical Director - TPG www.paciellogroup.com | www.HTML5accessibility.com | www.twitter.com/stevefaulkner HTML5: Techniques for providing useful text alternatives - dev.w3.org/html5/alt-techniques/ Web Accessibility Toolbar - www.paciellogroup.com/resources/wat-ie-about.html
Received on Tuesday, 22 February 2011 12:38:32 UTC