- From: Ben Schwarz <ben.schwarz@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 23:12:21 +1100
- To: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
- Cc: www-archive <www-archive@w3.org>, ian@hixie.ch, Michael Smith <mike@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <F68392CA121C402798DB309CBCCF4B5A@gmail.com>
Thanks Steve, I spoke to Mike regarding this earlier. The current plan is that he will get in touch with you to pull something together… longer term I plan to work on something with Mike, in person, in Tokyo when I visit in July. Cheers, Ben On Tuesday, 22 February 2011 at 8:00 PM, Steve Faulkner wrote: > Hi ben, thanks for the quick response, > > you wrote: > "I believe the title of the document / specification to be the most relevantly accurate title possible, irregardless of the inclusion of microdata. Although I'd be open to hear any suggestions for something better?" > > a suggestion "HTML A technical specification for Web developers" > > Also can you provide an estimate of when the W3C spec-author-view will be fixed? > > regards > stevef > > On 22 February 2011 08:22, Ben Schwarz <ben.schwarz@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Steve, > > > > I believe the title of the document / specification to be the most relevantly accurate title possible, irregardless of the inclusion of microdata. Although I'd be open to hear any suggestions for something better? > > > > As for the W3C spec-author-view—I see it to really be the same as the specification launched today. > > I understand the differences between the two, but they're one and the same in my opinion… (In the real world, people have a hard enough time working out who the WHATWG and W3C are) > > > > I'd hope to port the new work over to the spec-author-view, but I do wonder why the two need coexist, as the spec-author-view was a project that was created by Hixie, Mike Smith (as far as I know). The goals of that specification and mine are the same, I'd worked on both too… Personally, I'd like to hear feedback from both Hixie and Mike on this… > > > > Rather than _porting_ anything, I'd be more interested in writing a global W3C style guide & css package that could be included by all the willing specification authors, to tidy the typography and generally provide a solid pattern library for documentation. > > > > Thanks for your feedback, its always appreciated. I'm sure that this project is only really just beginning :) > > > > Cheers, > > > > Ben > > > > -- > > On Tuesday, 22 February 2011 at 7:03 PM, Steve Faulkner wrote: > > > Hi ben, great work on the developer document! > > > > > > I am a little confused though, the document is not a version of the HTML5 specification (http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/spec.html) it is a version of http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/ > > > So it should not claim to be "HTML5 A technical specification for Web developers" It includes things such as microdata that are not in HTML5. > > > > > > On a related subject, the HTML5 Edition for Web Authors http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec-author-view/ still has the color contrast issues that were present months ago. At the time i provided a modded style sheet which removed the issues. As I also suggested before, if you don't have the time or inclination to update HTML5 Edition for Web Authors I would be happy to take over. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 22 February 2011 12:13:26 UTC