Re: request to review HTML WG chairs decision on issue 133

Hi Steve,

> @2011-02-02 08:31 +0000:
> hi mike, thanks for your detailed explanation.
> 
> While i consider that the decision by the chairs decision was not based on
> any explicitly stated process rule. It is now clear that the rule is:
> 
> Once an issue is closed it loses its status as a pre last call issue

Yeah, I think that's a close enough description.

> The term prejudicial was meant to refer the effect upon the issue's pre-last
> call status. As in the issue is closed with prejudice (it will no longer be
> cosnidered as a pre last call issue)

OK, I see.

> I will not pursue this any further as it will be a waste of time.

All right

  --Mike

-- 
Michael[tm] Smith
http://people.w3.org/mike

Received on Wednesday, 2 February 2011 08:43:47 UTC