- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 14:48:09 -0400
- To: www-archive@w3.org
On 08/18/2011 02:44 PM, Ian Jacobs wrote: > > On 18 Aug 2011, at 1:34 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > >> On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 20:27:29 +0200, Ian Jacobs<ij@w3.org> wrote: >>> On 18 Aug 2011, at 1:24 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: >>>> Why is this discussed in Team-only space and not on spec-prod? It seems fair that people doing the actual work have a say in the matter. >>> >>> At time the Team chooses to work out differences internally first, then come forward with a position. This is one of those times. And we've been slowed down by vacations. >> >> We do not really have to discuss this further I suppose (it is as it is), but I think this is as problematic as Working Groups making "formal" comments on each other's work, which in practice is usually a comment-by-proxy from a couple of people in the Working Group trying to make their point seem overly important. In fact it might be slightly worse, as by having your discussion Team-only we get no insight in how you arrived at your position. > > I would expect us to provide rationale for a decision. Is this what you expect? Or fleshed out discussion? Like Anne, I would expect that the people doing the actual work would have an opportunity to directly participate. - Sam Ruby
Received on Thursday, 18 August 2011 18:48:47 UTC