- From: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 13:44:08 -0500
- To: "Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@opera.com>
- Cc: www-archive@w3.org, "Steven Faulkner" <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>, "Philippe Le Hegaret" <plh@w3.org>, Michael™ Smith <mike@w3.org>
On 18 Aug 2011, at 1:34 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 20:27:29 +0200, Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> wrote: >> On 18 Aug 2011, at 1:24 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: >>> Why is this discussed in Team-only space and not on spec-prod? It seems fair that people doing the actual work have a say in the matter. >> >> At time the Team chooses to work out differences internally first, then come forward with a position. This is one of those times. And we've been slowed down by vacations. > > We do not really have to discuss this further I suppose (it is as it is), but I think this is as problematic as Working Groups making "formal" comments on each other's work, which in practice is usually a comment-by-proxy from a couple of people in the Working Group trying to make their point seem overly important. In fact it might be slightly worse, as by having your discussion Team-only we get no insight in how you arrived at your position. I would expect us to provide rationale for a decision. Is this what you expect? Or fleshed out discussion? Ian > > > -- > Anne van Kesteren > http://annevankesteren.nl/ > -- Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs/ Tel: +1 718 260 9447
Received on Thursday, 18 August 2011 18:44:11 UTC