W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > January 2010

Re: HTML+RDFa Heartbeat Draft publishing request

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 09:59:33 +0100
Message-ID: <4B4EDCF5.2080600@gmx.de>
To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
CC: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>, Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>, www-archive <www-archive@w3.org>
Ian Hickson wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Jan 2010, Julian Reschke wrote:
>> Neither RDFa, nor Microdata are extension mechanisms that allow adding 
>> "independently developed vocabularies" to HTML.
> Could you describe the criteria by which one can recognise a mechanism for 
> allowing the addition of independently developed vocabularies? I'm baffled 
> as to what the point of RDFa and Microdata would be if not exactly that.

It would be helpful to demonstrate *how* Ruby or ITS can be added using 
RDFa or Microdata. (examples would be sufficient)

Best regards, Julian
Received on Thursday, 14 January 2010 09:00:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:33:45 UTC