- From: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>
- Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 10:07:13 -0800
- To: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>
- CC: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, www-archive <www-archive@w3.org>
What I remember is that they *were* on the issue-status page at the time. Unfortunately, the issue-status page does not have any record of history that I can see. Please date the issue-status page; is it under CVS or other version management, or could that be arranged. On ISSUE-10: I see an action http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/actions/135 ACTION-135 to get a review from Dick Bulterman and the action is marked CLOSED, but I see no such review linked from the action. I see a promise of a review http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Aug/0850.html but no review in the email archives. When an ACTION is marked CLOSED, shouldn't the result of the ACTION be evident from the ACTION record itself? I can't tell whether Shawn Medero -- who raised the issue -- expressed an opinion about closing the issue. On ISSUE-73: I think the distinction between "CLOSED because issue was resolved amicably" and "CLOSED because there was no change proposal by the deadline" is not moot. Issues that are resolved can be dropped forever, but issues that were closed even when there was substantial believe that there was a rationale for making a change (a problem) but just a lack of concrete proposals in time (a timely solution) should remain as questions for future versions of HTML, or even open for proposals from external reviewers who are not currently working group members (have not been members or have left for various reasons). In the case of ISSUE-73 I think the resolution is "CLOSED AS RESOLVED" vs. "CLOSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE". Larry -- http://larry.masinter.net -----Original Message----- From: Paul Cotton [mailto:Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 9:38 AM To: Larry Masinter Cc: Sam Ruby; Maciej Stachowiak Subject: ACTION-166 - Recheck status of issues 10 and 73 Agenda for our Dec 17 meeting is below. Minutes of our last WG meeting are at: http://www.w3.org/2009/12/17-html-wg-minutes.html At the Dec 17 meeting you asked me about the status of Issue-10 and Issue-73. http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/10 http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/73 > <masinter> 10 35 73 87? ... >paul: issue-35 is on due jan 14 >... issue-10.. that status may be out of date >... we will recheck on 10 >... we will also double check on issue-73 >... will do as soon after the meeting as I can > >action paul to recheck status of issues 10 and 73 > ><trackbot> Created ACTION-166 - Recheck status of issues 10 and 73 [on Paul Cotton - due 2009-12-24]. These issues are both closed and are not on the change proposal status page which we were discussing when you brought them up: http://dev.w3.org/html5/status/issue-status.html Can you help me understand why you thought we need to check on the status of Issue 10 and Issue-73? /paulc Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada 17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3 Tel: (425) 705-9596 Fax: (425) 936-7329 -----Original Message----- From: public-html-request@w3.org [mailto:public-html-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Paul Cotton Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 6:53 PM To: public-html@w3.org Subject: {agenda} HTML WG telcon 2009-12-17: action items, calls for consensus/proposals, task forces The HTML Working Group will have its usual weekly teleconference on 2009-12-17 for 60 minutes from 17:00Z to 18:00Z. http://timeanddate.com/s/1gqy Tokyo 02:00+1, Amsterdam/Oslo 18:00, London/Dublin 17:00, New Jersey/York 12 noon, Kansas City 11:00, Seattle/San Francisco 09:00. Chair of the meeting: Paul Cotton Scribe: TBD (See the end of this email for dial-in and IRC info.) == Agenda == 0. Pick a scribe 1. Review of action items pending review: [http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/agenda] None. 2. Review of due and overdue action items: [http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/agenda] a) ACTION-159 on Adrian Bateman: Document Extensibility Use Case for Editors on Wiki b) ACTION-127 on Maciej Stachowiak: Establish process for "official WG response" to other WG's RFC on LC drafts c) ACTION-133 on Richard Schwerdtfeger: Develop an accessibility API and model for canvas as well as attributes to specify alternative content 3. Microdata proposals poll a) ISSUE-76 (Microdata/RDFa) Status: - This questionnaire is open for answers until 23:59, Boston time on 2009-12-17. - Results: http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/issue-76-objection-poll/results - Chairs will meet on Tue Dec 29 to review the results of this poll and to recommend the next steps. 4. Review of submitted Change Proposals: [http://dev.w3.org/html5/status/issue-status.html] a) ISSUE-1 (PINGPOST) b) ISSUE-2 (PINGUI) c) ISSUE-4 (html-versioning) d) ISSUE-30 (longdesc) e) ISSUE-32 (table-summary) f) ISSUE-56 (urls-webarch) g) ISSUE-83 (dt-dd-semantics) 5. Review of Chair Calls for Proposals: [http://dev.w3.org/html5/status/issue-status.html] Due by this meeting: a) ISSUE-87 (attr-normalization) due Dec 17 Due later: b) ISSUE-88 (content-language-multiple) due Jan 1 (ACTION-161 on Leif Halvard Silli) c) ISSUE-35 (aria-processing) due Jan 14 (ACTION-138 on Steve Faulkner) d) ISSUE-66 (image-analysis) due Jan 16 (awaiting proposal from Matt May) e) ISSUE-74 (canvas-accessibility) due Jan 16 (ACTION-133 on Richard Schwerdtfeger) f) ISSUE-79 (meta-keywords) due Jan 16 (no volunteers) g) ISSUE-81 (representation-vs-resource) due Jan 16 (no volunteers) h) ISSUE-84 (legacy-doctypes) due Jan 16 (no volunteers) i) ISSUE-27 (rel-ownership) due Jan 21 (ACTION-160 on Paul C) 6. Review of Chair Calls for Consensus: [http://dev.w3.org/html5/status/issue-status.html] Due by this meeting: a) ISSUE-73 (predefined-voc) due Dec 17 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Dec/0250.html Due later: b) ISSUE-59 (normative-language-reference) due Jan 1 (extended from Dec 17) c) ISSUE-67 (html-parsing-dom) due Jan 1 (extended from Dec 17) 7. New issues this week: [http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/raised] None. 8. Status of Task Forces a) HTML Accessibility Task Force b) Testing Task Force 9. REMINDER: Next meeting is on Thu Jan 7 2010. 10. Adjournment == Dial-in and IRC Details == Zakim teleconference bridge +1.617.761.6200, +33.4.89.06.34.99, +44.117.370.6152 code: HTML (4865) Supplementary IRC chat (logged) #html-wg on irc.w3.org port 6665 or port 80
Received on Tuesday, 5 January 2010 18:07:59 UTC