- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2009 13:09:24 +0100
- To: "Sam Ruby" <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Cc: "Laura Carlson" <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>, "Shelley Powers" <shelley.just@gmail.com>, "Paul Cotton" <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, "Maciej Stachowiak" <mjs@apple.com>, "Web Archive" <www-archive@w3.org>
On Mon, 09 Nov 2009 13:05:44 +0100, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote: > Anne van Kesteren wrote: >> -public-html >> +www-archive >> On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 13:52:29 -0800, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> >> wrote: >>> So, on one hand, I have zero sympathy for any active participant in >>> the working group who chose to attend a session on MathML who may >>> claim to have been unaware of this work or making any statement other >>> than the fact that while they personally did not have a chance to >>> review it, sufficient others have for this to have been sent on behalf >>> of the working group. >> >> When the session was announced I got the impression it was about MathML >> integration (also based on a short discussion earlier with another Math >> WG member) and since I know something about that I attended. I had no >> idea MathML feedback would be discussed. > > Did I suggest that you shouldn't have attended? I do not think the "zero sympathy" is fair given the situation. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Monday, 9 November 2009 12:10:12 UTC