- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2009 07:05:44 -0500
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- CC: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>, Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com>, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Web Archive <www-archive@w3.org>
Anne van Kesteren wrote: > -public-html > +www-archive > > On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 13:52:29 -0800, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> > wrote: >> So, on one hand, I have zero sympathy for any active participant in >> the working group who chose to attend a session on MathML who may >> claim to have been unaware of this work or making any statement other >> than the fact that while they personally did not have a chance to >> review it, sufficient others have for this to have been sent on behalf >> of the working group. > > When the session was announced I got the impression it was about MathML > integration (also based on a short discussion earlier with another Math > WG member) and since I know something about that I attended. I had no > idea MathML feedback would be discussed. Did I suggest that you shouldn't have attended? - Sam Ruby
Received on Monday, 9 November 2009 12:06:18 UTC