- From: Renato Iannella <renato@nicta.com.au>
- Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 09:35:28 +1000
- To: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>
- CC: Peter Mika <pmika@yahoo-inc.com>, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>, Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, Ralph Swick <swick@w3.org>, "martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org" <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org>, "www-archive@w3.org" <www-archive@w3.org>
> > On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 11:30 AM, Peter Mika <pmika@yahoo-inc.com> > wrote: >> And of course, since yesterday, we have to take Google's vcard >> ontology into >> account: >> >> http://rdf.data-vocabulary.org/rdf.xml Oh Dear - yet another one! >> And the rest of their ontologies into account, but they look like > straightforward subset of the vCard ontology, and so on with reviewers > etc, so I'm not concerned. What we really need to do is to move on > getting certain prefixes for RDFa "reserved" by HTML5, sorting Hixie's > meta-data proposal. I think, as well a good unified vocabulary hosting > site/software endorsed by Yahoo!, Google, and W3C ideally. > Hmmm.....organizationally, what do people think is the next step here? Lets just focus one thing (for now)....a common vCard/RDF representation that we can widely public/size. With this, hopefully, the likes of Google will reuse this vocab.... Cheers... Renato Iannella NICTA
Received on Thursday, 14 May 2009 23:49:39 UTC