- From: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>
- Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 11:52:43 +0200
- To: Peter Mika <pmika@yahoo-inc.com>
- Cc: Renato Iannella <renato@nicta.com.au>, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>, Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, Ralph Swick <swick@w3.org>, martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org, www-archive@w3.org
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 11:30 AM, Peter Mika <pmika@yahoo-inc.com> wrote: > And of course, since yesterday, we have to take Google's vcard ontology into > account: > > http://rdf.data-vocabulary.org/rdf.xml And the rest of their ontologies into account, but they look like straightforward subset of the vCard ontology, and so on with reviewers etc, so I'm not concerned. What we really need to do is to move on getting certain prefixes for RDFa "reserved" by HTML5, sorting Hixie's meta-data proposal. I think, as well a good unified vocabulary hosting site/software endorsed by Yahoo!, Google, and W3C ideally. Hmmm.....organizationally, what do people think is the next step here? > Cheers, > Peter > > Harry Halpin wrote: >> >> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 1:03 AM, Renato Iannella <renato@nicta.com.au> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> On 12 May 2009, at 18:39, Dan Brickley wrote: >>> >>> >>>> >>>> If others amongst you will be there, why don't you get together and try >>>> to make some progress there? I suggest the Social Web XG as a mechanism >>>> for tracking this effort, even if the document surfaces as a SWIG Note, >>>> since SWXG meets regularly with minutes, agendas etc while SWIG doesn't >>>> have that kind of a mechanism. Enough SWIG folk are engaged in this >>>> discussion (now and over the years) that I don't see a problem with >>>> doing the update under SWIG. >>>> >> >> I'll be at Heraklion for ESWC2009, and also of courese in SWXG. Would >> like to merge, will have to re-read both vCard Notes and try to see >> what way they can be combined. Off the top of my head, it appears the >> first Note demonstrates the use of RDF containers, while the second >> aims for simplicity. We could just aim for simplicity while still >> showing how RDF containers can be used to help deal with the complex >> cases. The main keys will be to normalise property names and deal with >> any actual incompatibilities, which I assume are few. >> >> >>> >>> Great ... see u there! >>> >>> Cheers... Renato Iannella >>> NICTA >>> >>> >>> >>> > >
Received on Thursday, 14 May 2009 09:53:25 UTC