- From: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>
- Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 11:15:10 -0700
- To: Philip Taylor <pjt47@cam.ac.uk>
- CC: "www-archive@w3.org" <www-archive@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <8B62A039C620904E92F1233570534C9B0118CD7412DB@nambx04.corp.adobe.com>
http://canvex.lazyilluminati.com/misc/cgi/issues.cgi/ gives me a list of 15 issues. http://www.whatwg.org/issues in Chrome listed hundreds (As Ian said in his reply, "the current list of feedback is quite long" -- it included Sherry's comment down in the last dozen or so, after an enormously long list of other comments). I retried it half an hour later, and now whatwg.org doesn't respond at all: Chrome and Safari hang waiting indefinitely. If I open it with Acrobat to make a PDF file, I get a meaningless document (see attachment). The HTML working group should manage priorities of the HTML document without requiring registration on the proprietary "WhatWG.org" site. W3C has extensive tools for managing priorities and issues, designed to insure an open process. This isn't. Larry -- http://larry.masinter.net -----Original Message----- From: Philip Taylor [mailto:pjt47@cam.ac.uk] Sent: Monday, May 04, 2009 10:42 AM To: Larry Masinter Cc: www-archive@w3.org Subject: Re: [whatwg] notes on current HTML5 draft Larry Masinter wrote: > The "current list of feedback" http://www.whatwg.org/issues > isn't even readable with some browsers, and the so-called > "static list" of issues doesn't match the dynamic list. What specific problems do you see with the static list? Other than a time delay of up to 24 hours due to caching, it should be showing identical data to the dynamic list. (If there are real bugs, I'd like to fix them.) -- Philip Taylor pjt47@cam.ac.uk
Attachments
- application/pdf attachment: WHATWG Issues List.pdf
Received on Monday, 4 May 2009 18:16:01 UTC