Re: {agenda} HTML WG telcon 2009-02-06

On Feb 5, 2009, at 7:41 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:

> Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>> Sam,
>> This message does not rise to the standards of civility you are  
>> trying to set. Dave was trying to outline the issues in a  
>> constructive way, and your response is hostile and snarky (for  
>> instance implying cleverly that he should be ignored).
>> Regards,
>> Maciej
> Maybe it's my lack of command of the English language, or maybe  
> you're just reading something into Sam's statement that just isn't  
> there.
> I found it well-written, don't see any hostility, but I do see an  
> opinion (which Sam *is* allowed to have, isn't he?).

I took Sam's comment, "I agree with the suggestion you close your  
email with", as referring to "Hope that helps;  feel free to ignore me  
if not...", particularly in light of the generally negative light it  
casts on things. Which would not be a very nice thing to say. Maybe  
that's not what he meant, or maybe he said it in haste, which is why  
my message was on www-archive and not public-html or public-html-wg- 

Sam is indeed allowed to have and express an opinion as long as it  
does not interfere with impartially managing the work of the group.


Received on Thursday, 5 February 2009 15:58:22 UTC