Re: vCard RDF merge....

Renato -

   I've been pretty busy recently - but am willing to give a merger a
sort sometime next week. How does next week look for you?

On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 12:47 AM, Renato Iannella<renato@nicta.com.au> wrote:
> Does anyone have any more views on the current situation?
>
> I don't want to delay any current work progress.....and if the answer is,
> let them just use the Ontology, then lets...
>
> (I also plan to look at vCard 4.0 to do an closer RDF mapping to it....but
> that is later work...)
>
> Renato
>
>
> On 7 Aug 2009, at 22:24, Renato Iannella wrote:
>
>>
>> Martin, I started to put the two together:
>>
>>  http://spin.nicta.org.au/vcardrdf/vcard-rdf-2009.html
>>
>> That's when I send the email asking some questions:
>>
>>  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2009Jun/0146.html
>>
>> I'm really stuck on the structure for multiple property values which vCard
>> supports.
>> Which is what is in the NOTE, but not in the Ontology, and mentioned here:
>>
>>  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2009Jun/0147.html
>>
>> I suppose if you are after just the ontology - and not a "faithful"
>> mapping of the vCard semantics - then it would be easiest to just use the
>> current ontology:
>>
>>  http://developer.yahoo.com/searchmonkey/smguide/vcard-details.html
>>
>>
>> Cheers...  Renato Iannella
>> NICTA
>>
>
> Cheers...  Renato Iannella
> NICTA
>
>

Received on Monday, 17 August 2009 23:58:48 UTC