- From: Martin Hepp (UniBW) <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org>
- Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2009 11:04:20 +0200
- To: Renato Iannella <renato@nicta.com.au>
- CC: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>, Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>, Peter Mika <pmika@yahoo-inc.com>, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>, Harry Halpin <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>, Brian Suda <brian.suda@gmail.com>, www-archive@w3.org
- Message-ID: <4A7A9C94.4040505@ebusiness-unibw.org>
Dear all: I begin to worry - we really need to have a consolidated vcard2006 recommendation quickly. It does not matter whether it is imperfect or incomplete, but it is needed. Basically, the subset of patterns suggested by Yahoo would work fine for me (including their suggestion to use plain strings instead of URIs for phone numbers / tel:). In my group alone, there are a handful of tools that are necessarily hard-wired to the vcard modeling patterns, and we need to finalize them. Even worse, people are already using those tools for creating meta-data for their businesses, and we will really kill the growing momentum if we ask them to update the data structures on a weekly basis. So if it is actually more complicated than assessed in Crete to produce a consolidated 2006 spec, then let's rather create two activities - a quick fix, i.e. a compatible subset based on the Yahoo patterns, and a comprehensive update of the spec, which should try to be backwards-compatible with the subset. For the latter, we would have an arbitrary amount of time ;-) In a nutshell, I really think we should do what we can do in two weeks from now or sooner. It puts a break on the whole Web of Linked Data movement if we are unable to give people a step-by-step recipe on how to publish their contact details as meta-data. Uncertainty is the key evil to the adoption of standards and novel technology... Best Martin Renato Iannella wrote: > > Thanks for the discussion everyone.... > > Firstly, the 2001 Note and 2006 Ontology were focussed on vCard 3.0.... > > Since vCard 4.0 is close to final...not that many changes to > go...should we simply say....leave the NOTE/Ontology as they are and > lets do the RDF for vCard 4.0 ? > > Comments? > > Cheers... Renato Iannella > NICTA > > -- -------------------------------------------------------------- martin hepp e-business & web science research group universitaet der bundeswehr muenchen e-mail: mhepp@computer.org phone: +49-(0)89-6004-4217 fax: +49-(0)89-6004-4620 www: http://www.unibw.de/ebusiness/ (group) http://www.heppnetz.de/ (personal) skype: mfhepp twitter: mfhepp Check out GoodRelations for E-Commerce on the Web of Linked Data! ================================================================= Webcast: http://www.heppnetz.de/projects/goodrelations/webcast/ Recipe for Yahoo SearcMonkey: http://tr.im/rAbN Talk at the Semantic Technology Conference 2009: "Semantic Web-based E-Commerce: The GoodRelations Ontology" http://tinyurl.com/semtech-hepp Overview article on Semantic Universe: http://tinyurl.com/goodrelations-universe Project page: http://purl.org/goodrelations/ Resources for developers: http://www.ebusiness-unibw.org/wiki/GoodRelations Tutorial materials: CEC'09 2009 Tutorial: The Web of Data for E-Commerce: A Hands-on Introduction to the GoodRelations Ontology, RDFa, and Yahoo! SearchMonkey http://tr.im/grcec09
Received on Thursday, 6 August 2009 09:05:21 UTC