- From: Chris Wilson <Chris.Wilson@microsoft.com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 13:55:12 -0700
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, Aaron M Leventhal <aleventh@us.ibm.com>
- CC: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>, Cullen Sauls <cullens@microsoft.com>, Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com>, Jon Gunderson <jongund@uiuc.edu>, Marc Silbey <marcsil@windows.microsoft.com>, David Poehlman <poehlman1@comcast.net>, Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>, Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>, "w3c-wai-pf@w3.org" <w3c-wai-pf@w3.org>, "www-archive@w3.org" <www-archive@w3.org>
Indeed. This was certainly just a mistake (that we didn't discuss beforehand). -----Original Message----- From: Anne van Kesteren [mailto:annevk@opera.com] Sent: Friday, March 14, 2008 11:40 AM To: Chris Wilson; Aaron M Leventhal Cc: Charles McCathieNevile; Cullen Sauls; Dave Pawson; Jon Gunderson; Marc Silbey; David Poehlman; Richard Schwerdtfeger; Simon Pieters; w3c-wai-pf@w3.org; www-archive@w3.org Subject: Re: IE8 incompatibility issues On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 19:04:51 +0100, Chris Wilson <Chris.Wilson@microsoft.com> wrote: > As previously stated, I want to get to an interoperable point here. > However, I would point out that "If it's not in a speci do not support > it or you break everyone else." would prevent all innovation outside > Recommendation status. Agreed, that would be bad. I guess what we're asking for is communicating such extensions in advance so that they can be discussed. (Which is arguably what we're doing now, but I rather learn it from a MS representative in a WG than in the release notes of a new beta.) -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Friday, 14 March 2008 20:56:18 UTC