- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 19:40:12 +0100
- To: "Chris Wilson" <Chris.Wilson@microsoft.com>, "Aaron M Leventhal" <aleventh@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: "Charles McCathieNevile" <chaals@opera.com>, "Cullen Sauls" <cullens@microsoft.com>, "Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com>, "Jon Gunderson" <jongund@uiuc.edu>, "Marc Silbey" <marcsil@windows.microsoft.com>, "David Poehlman" <poehlman1@comcast.net>, "Richard Schwerdtfeger" <schwer@us.ibm.com>, "Simon Pieters" <simonp@opera.com>, "w3c-wai-pf@w3.org" <w3c-wai-pf@w3.org>, "www-archive@w3.org" <www-archive@w3.org>
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 19:04:51 +0100, Chris Wilson <Chris.Wilson@microsoft.com> wrote: > As previously stated, I want to get to an interoperable point here. > However, I would point out that "If it's not in a speci do not support > it or you break everyone else." would prevent all innovation outside > Recommendation status. Agreed, that would be bad. I guess what we're asking for is communicating such extensions in advance so that they can be discussed. (Which is arguably what we're doing now, but I rather learn it from a MS representative in a WG than in the release notes of a new beta.) -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Friday, 14 March 2008 18:46:05 UTC