- From: Ted Guild <ted@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 12:20:45 -0400
- To: "Williams, Stuart (HP Labs, Bristol)" <skw@hp.com>
- Cc: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>, "cmsmcq@w3.org" <cmsmcq@w3.org>, "www-archive@w3.org" <www-archive@w3.org>
"Williams, Stuart (HP Labs, Bristol)" <skw@hp.com> writes: > In respect of: > >> >> I agree influencing OS vendors is a major part of this, I think we can >> >> get quite a few (Linux, Mac other UNIX) via libXML and Daniel Veillard >> >> is very willing to help. I would also go to Michael Champion of >> >> Microsoft based on TAG decision and if Mac, Linux etc are doing this >> >> it will likely influence their decision. > > Is there anything specific that you are looking for as a "TAG > decision". If you like, can you frame the question that you'd like > to address? What would enable you to "...go to Michael Champion of > Microsoft based on TAG decision..." Stuart, For the TAG to decide for Web Architectural consideration: -Should W3C package, maintain (as new standards emerge) and promote use of Catalogs of it's various XML Schemata? Simple yes or no finding is all I need. I am in favor as expressed in the earlier email along with my motivation and some architectural points. How that happens if approved will fall on W3C Systems and Communications Teams to get started and hopefully get some momentum taken by OS vendors and community. I already have some thoughts on implementation and strategy. Much obliged, -- Ted Guild <ted@w3.org> W3C Systems Team http://www.w3.org
Received on Thursday, 19 June 2008 16:22:10 UTC