W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > June 2008

Re: URGENT: Need PDF of MS' input [Was Re: Seeking earlier feedback from MS]

From: Michael(tm) Smith <mike@w3.org>
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 02:01:16 +0900
To: Chris Wilson <Chris.Wilson@microsoft.com>
Cc: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>, Sunava Dutta <sunavad@windows.microsoft.com>, Michael Champion <Michael.Champion@microsoft.com>, Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>, Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>, Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>, "www-archive@w3.org" <www-archive@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20080613170114.GO6754@sideshowbarker>

To put it very simply what we have all have preferred from the
beginning is for the comments to be posted *directly to the list*
in PLAIN TEXT the way we have handled the rest of the
communication around this.

Is there some reason you guys can't manage to find a way to do that?


Chris Wilson <Chris.Wilson@microsoft.com>, 2008-06-13 09:56 -0700:

> Out of curiousity, why would you want a proprietary-format copy of the paper?
> From: Arthur Barstow [mailto:art.barstow@nokia.com]
> Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 3:58 AM
> To: Sunava Dutta; Michael Champion; Chris Wilson
> Cc: Rigo Wenning; Charles McCathieNevile; Doug Schepers; Mike Smith; www-archive@w3.org
> Subject: URGENT: Need PDF of MS' input [Was Re: Seeking earlier feedback from MS]
> Importance: High
> All - please address this request ASAP i.e. today.
> This input is already overdue by one week and the f2f meeting is only two weeks away.
> -Regards, Art Barstow
> Begin forwarded message:
> From: "ext Rigo Wenning" <rigo@w3.org<mailto:rigo@w3.org>>
> Date: June 12, 2008 5:06:01 PM EDT
> To: <public-webapps@w3.org<mailto:public-webapps@w3.org>>
> Cc: "Barstow Art (Nokia-OCTO/Boston)" <art.barstow@nokia.com<mailto:art.barstow@nokia.com>>, <sunavad@windows.microsoft.com<mailto:sunavad@windows.microsoft.com>>, <Michael.Champion@microsoft.com<mailto:Michael.Champion@microsoft.com>>
> Subject: Re: Need PDF of MS' input [Was Re: Seeking earlier feedback from MS]
> Dear all,
> I've looked at the click-through license of the Microsoft Public
> License. The license has some viral effects and if the specification
> you are producing here will re-use parts of Microsoft's document, we
> may end up in a situation where the Recommendation would also have to
> carry the MS-Public license because of the click-through.
> I would rather like to avoid such a confusing situation. So if this
> document is not only for reading, I would kindly ask Microsoft to
> provide the document either in member space or in public space as a
> contribution within the framework of the work of this group. This
> would allow all to work in the context they expect. The contribution
> can be done by sending the document to the mailing-list or adding it
> to the wiki with a comment that it is designated to be input and
> contribution to the WebAPI work.
> Would that be feasible? I think that was what Art requested in the
> message cited below.
> Best,
> Rigo Wenning
> W3C Staff counsel
> Art Barstow wrote:
> Sunava - as requested by several members of the WG, please send a
> version of this document directly to the public-webapps mail list.
> -Thanks, Art Barstow

Michael(tm) Smith

Received on Friday, 13 June 2008 17:01:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:33:30 UTC