- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 19:57:59 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: "Bonner, Matt" <matt.bonner@hp.com>, Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>, Kristof Zelechovski <giecrilj@stegny.2a.pl>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>, "www-archive@w3.org" <www-archive@w3.org>
On Fri, 22 Aug 2008, Julian Reschke wrote: > Ian Hickson wrote: > > On Fri, 22 Aug 2008, Julian Reschke wrote: > > > Ian Hickson wrote: > > > > On Fri, 22 Aug 2008, Bonner, Matt wrote: > > > > > Well, for example, HTML5 provides the data-* attributes. Could ccREL > > > > > use > > > > > those instead? To flip what you have said, perhaps reading/skimming > > > > > the > > > > > "extensions" sections HTML5 spec would help the ccREL advocates > > > > > understand > > > > > how best to fit ccREL into HTML5. > > > > The HTML5 spec admittedly doesn't make that very easy, but there's an > > > > entry > > > > in the FAQ that covers the main extension points: > > > > > > > > http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/FAQ#HTML5_should_support_a_way_for_anyone_to_invent_new_elements.21 > > > > > > > > For example, RDF n3 could be included directly (and unambiguously) using > > > > the > > > > <script type="..."> extension mechanism. > > > "The script element allows authors to include dynamic script and script > > > data > > > in their documents." -- <http://www.w3.org/html/wg/html5/#script> > > > > Right, this would be script data. > > How is this script data? Where's the script? Hm, you're right, the terminology here isn't great. I've updated HTML5 to unambiguously allow this. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Friday, 22 August 2008 19:58:24 UTC