Re: [whatwg] Creative Commons Rights Expression Language

Ian Hickson wrote:
> For example, RDF n3 could be included directly (and unambiguously) using 
> the <script type="..."> extension mechanism.

You really read the ccREL proposal? :)

We want DRY, so that human-rendered data and machine-readable data can
be kept in sync at all times. That goes to your point about unmaintained
metadata. Metadata is much more likely be maintained if it has a
user-visible component.

This is actually a principle that the microformats community touted
before we did, and we strongly agree with it.

-Ben