W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > September 2007

Re: let authors choose text/html or application/xhtml+xml (detailed review of section 1. Introduction)

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 02:14:00 +0000 (UTC)
To: Sam Ruby <rubys@us.ibm.com>
Cc: www-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0709050207200.3943@dhalsim.dreamhost.com>

On Fri, 31 Aug 2007, Sam Ruby wrote:
> (*) I can only presume that the current HTML5 draft reflects Ian's 
> current thinking on the matter which is that certain media types are to 
> be treated as authoritative, and others are to be treated as a hint and 
> possibly overridden based on sniffing.

Actually, it doesn't. I think we should dump Content-Type altogether. The 
spec represents the closest I could get to the existing specs (in 
particular HTTP) without being ignored by browser vendors. There are many 
things in the HTML5 spec that I disagree with, but that are there because 
rational arguments were made and evidence presented. Another example of 
something in HTML5 I don't want there is the /> nonsense you argued for. :-)

Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Wednesday, 5 September 2007 02:14:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:33:15 UTC