artistic expression was...
I do know of one excellent instance where the author refused to name
alt tags, his claim was I believe sincere and valid.
Our students are pre-literate, or learning to read, however screen
readers are not generally helpful. They do benefit from symbols and
illustrations.
Some of you will know that there was at one time ~2003 in WAI a drive
for media equivalence, which would have recognised that need, and
might have for instance recommended text to be illustrated.
My guess is that not many readers on this list would feel competent
to illustrate a creative work. That is not merely to illustrate the
word "car", but to convey the meaning of say "Waiting for Godot" or
"The Birthday Party" through illustration.
http://www.magpiedance.org.uk/magpol-library/s0/1.html
This slide show, will I hope convey to each one of you some of that
wonder,
which the creator felt unable himself to use words.
We would be delighted for anyone who felt capable to provide suitable
alt content.
content that wasn't merely box ticking but inspirational.
regards
Jonathan Chetwynd
Accessibility Consultant on Media Literacy and the Internet
my apologies as I've not been following the thread or the court case,
but do have more than 12 years experience with learning and cognitive
disabilities. and contributed to WAI for most of them, most recently
having contributed the formal objection to WCAG2