W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > November 2007

Re: offline stuff

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 22:00:47 +0100
To: "Sam Ruby" <rubys@us.ibm.com>
Cc: www-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.t2mhzlq264w2qv@annevk-t60.oslo.opera.com>

On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 21:46:07 +0100, Sam Ruby <rubys@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>> On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 17:59:04 +0100, Sam Ruby <rubys@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>>> I'm ashamed to say that if there is a circular dependency involving  
>>> offline, it isn't obvious to this reader, and I would greatly  
>>> appreciate it some kind soul would point it out.
>>  Search for "manifest" throughout the specification and look at the  
>> fifth paragraph of the second subsection of #offline which is quite  
>> explicit about this. I guess I shouldn't be shocked by people not  
>> reading the specification, but when asking specific questions like this  
>> it would sort of help to first check, I think.
> raise Exception("Rudeness")

I had the same feeling when you repeatedly asked this question over and  
over again.

>> (It is also not clear to me why not having an answer to this question  
>> in any way delays your review of the introductory note Ian and I wrote.)
> I was going to look into this further, but as you seem to be in a hurry,  
> I guess the following will have to do:
>      No.  SQL and offline application caching APIs would clearly be
>      a good thing; my only issue is the scope question.  Please
>      treat this answer as if it were "yes, but only if the charter
>      was modified first".

I don't see how this is a review of the relevant note. This seems more  
like an opinion on whether the HTML5 specification should contain those  
features, but it is good to know that you consider those features to be  
out of scope, thanks.

Anne van Kesteren
Received on Friday, 30 November 2007 21:00:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:33:18 UTC