Henri Sivonen wrote: > ... > That's one possibility, but it would be much more useful if the specs > for IRIs/URIs actually suited the original and most common use case--use > in HTML href attributes--without definitional preprocessing gymnastics. > ... I'd say that the specs are just fine; they just do not work well for something that pretends to be a URI but isn't. The way "javascript:" is used inside HTML hrefs has *nothing* to do with resource identification. The most honest way to go forward would be just to acknowledge this, and to document it in HTML5. BR, JulianReceived on Friday, 23 November 2007 20:17:07 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:33:18 UTC