- From: Jason Karns <karnsj@cse.ohio-state.edu>
- Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 17:19:35 -0400
- To: "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: www-archive@w3.org, "Harry Halpin" <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>, "Ben Adida" <ben@adida.net>
I apologize. I meant to Reply-All. > > Are you interested in coding that up? > Yeah, I'd be willing to do that. > Ben, Harry, do you know of any further work on transformations > from creative commons HTML markup to RDF? > > > 3) Support those who link directly to the RDF version of the license > > rather than to the HTML version > > Hmm... I'm not sure I understand what you mean there. Could you > elaborate? > Currently, you can request a CC license in RDF format by appending 'rdf' to the license url. For instance: a) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/ b) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/rdf I currently link directly to the rdf version of the license in my html documents with rel=license. I see very few differences between the web.resource.org/cc RDF license and the http://creativecommons.org/ns# RDF license. Would it make sense to simply return the RDF version of the CC license rather than transforming it into the web.resource.org version? Cheers, Jason
Received on Monday, 21 May 2007 21:58:42 UTC