- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 22:45:18 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Kristof Zelechovski <giecrilj@stegny.2a.pl>
- Cc: www-archive@w3.org
On Wed, 20 Jun 2007, Kristof Zelechovski wrote: > > A void element cannot have any content because there is no way to specify it > in the source. Such a relation is called entailment. No, the syntax doesn't impose requirements on the content model. For example, the syntax doesn't let you put <ul>s inside <p>s, but the content model allows it. It would be quite possible for us to allow content inside void elements, it would just mean you couldn't represent that content model in text/html (you'd have to use XML or some other serialisation of the DOM, like JSON). -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Tuesday, 19 June 2007 22:45:50 UTC