- From: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>
- Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2007 16:43:16 -0500
- To: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>
- CC: tbaker@tbaker.de, schreiber@cs.vu.nl, www-archive@w3.org
Harry, The latest RDFa documents are all linked from: http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/RDFa which are a notable update since the last WD (I think I've sent the URLs out a few times.) That said, when this comes out in WD form, it will be updated at the URL you have ([7] in your references). I don't know about linking the RDFa bookmarklets in a WD or REC-track document... probably not stable enough for that. Regarding the ability of GRDDL to output any serialization of RDF: I know I haven't had very good attendance on the call, but I think the latest solution---to try every transform and figure out which one the agent cares about---is lacking. Unless these transforms can be typed in some way, they're not likely to be useful to an RDFa agent, especially since many RDFa agents will use client-side Javascript and thus not be able to "try every transform and see which one fits." I believe I've said this on GRDDL calls before, but if you need me to make this comment more officially, I can. -Ben Harry Halpin wrote: > I'm Harry Halpin, the Chair of the GRDDL WG [1] which links XML and > XHTML(including "microformats") to the Semantic Web in order to > faciliate the deployment of the Semantic Web. w > > In order to prevent a "surprise" Last Call, I'd like for your WG to know > that we are going to go, barring any final comments or problems, to > request move to Last Call on or shortly after Feb 15th for the following > three documents: > > 1) GRDDL Specification [2] > 2) GRDDL Primer [3] > 3) GRDDL Use Cases [4] > > We believe this technology is related (of course!) to the SWD WG, and > we'd appreciate if this message was forwarded to either your listserv or > to interested parties in your list. > > Primarily, we are interested in interoperating with RDFa, and have > included a use-case involving RDFa [2] and in our Primer [3]. While > currently in our example in the Primer we will just RDFa as an "input" > format to extract RDF/XML from, in our Use-Case document we have a use > case that involves using a RDFa-aware browser and converting from > microformats to RDFa, much like Ben Adida's "hGRDDL" work [5]. We plan > to link to that work in our primer, should we use this link [6]? > > Also, is this the most stable RDFa spec? [7] Is that URI going to > change? Also, since we are aiming for interoperability with SWD > specifications, if appropriate, do link to GRDDL specs. > > Note that although people seem to forget this, GRDDL takes in an XML > document and produces an abstract RDF graph, which can be serialized as > RDFa, so GRDDL is *not* limited to producing RDF/XML. > The test-suite uses RDF/XML as its output tests, but it does not match > on the bytes, but on the graph. > > [1 ]http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/ > [2] http://www.w3.org/2004/01/rdxh/spec > [3] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/doc29/primer.html > [4] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/doc43/scenario-gallery.htm > [5] > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/doc43/scenario-gallery.htm#scheduling_use_case > [6] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/HTML/rdfa-bookmarklet/ > [7] http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-rdfa-primer/ > > thank you, >
Received on Monday, 5 February 2007 21:41:28 UTC