Re: Media types for RDF languages N3 and Turtle

Sean B. Palmer wrote:
> Perhaps, as Dan Connolly suggested on IRC, some civil disobedience of
> RFC 2046 is called for here--as long as we're sure that this won't
> cause any security or interoperability problems that would make it not
> worth the effort.
>   

I would wholeheartedly be in favor of that course, as long as we:

* thoroughly document what we're doing, explaining why we're doing it;
* publicize what we're doing; and
* encourage others to follow suit.

I don't think waiting for an RFC 2046 replacement would be productive, 
but I also don't think it's helpful if we do this in some dark, obscure 
corner. Let's do the Right Thing, yet try to get everyone to follow.

Garret

Received on Monday, 17 December 2007 19:52:06 UTC