- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 22:07:34 +0000
- To: www-archive@w3.org, Phil Archer <parcher@icra.org>, "Carroll, Jeremy John" <jeremy.carroll@hp.com>, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>, "Williams, Stuart (HP Labs, Bristol)" <skw@hp.com>
- CC: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
Still to-do, on Monday Jeremy Carroll wrote: > - resource descriptions and monotonicity > I got a bad non-monotonic feeling while reading the powder-grouping > WD; interestingly it was while reading bits that had clearly been > written with the issue in mind :( > > - the subclass relationship > I take the reified rdfs:subClassOf triple in the example that has > circulated in earlier e-mail to be a response to a request to be more > formal, or more OWL like, in response to the powder-dr WD. However, the > design in the WD looks more user-friendly to me, if it could be made to > work ... >
Received on Friday, 14 December 2007 22:08:08 UTC