- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 21:56:01 +0000 (UTC)
- To: "Manuel Amador (Rudd-O)" <rudd-o@rudd-o.com>
- Cc: www-archive@w3.org
On Thu, 13 Dec 2007, Manuel Amador (Rudd-O) wrote: > > > > It would make no sense to require a different baseline audio codec for > > the non-sfx use case for <audio> than was required for <video>.) > > Of course it would make sense. People use their Web pages to put up > music all the time, much more often than for sound FX. They aren't > gonna upload files tens of megabytes in size for each song! Please carefully reread what I wrote -- I didn't suggest that people should use uncompressed PCM/WAVE data for background music, I merely suggested that the compressed audio codec for <audio> should be the same as the one for <video>. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Thursday, 13 December 2007 21:56:13 UTC