W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > October 2006

Re: [XBL] XBL 2.0 subtree or XML Fragment body

From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 15:59:33 +0900
Message-Id: <BD51B094-D942-42C0-BDC8-39545AFFAA53@w3.org>
Cc: www-archive@w3.org
To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>

Hi Bjoern,

Le 5 oct. 06 à 15:27, Bjoern Hoehrmann a écrit :
> * karl@w3.org wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>> This is a QA Review comment for "XML Binding Language (XBL) 2.0"
>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-xbl-20060907/
>> 2006-06-19
>> Last Call WD
>>
>> About http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-xbl-20060907/#terminology
>
> Your comments would be so much more readable if you could drop all  
> this
> redundant information, indent quotes, and wrap lines at ~76  
> characters.
> For example, instead of all of the above, I would just write:
>
>   In http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-xbl-20060907/#terminology

Point taken :)  I'll modify my script:
	- to remove redundant information.
	- indenting quote is a bit more delicate but I can try.

Though I'm not a big fan of 76 characters lines which breaks awfully  
in long threads or in the fact that do not resize if I decide to have  
a small window in my mailer.

> We know that this is a comment, what the title of the document is,  
> when
> it was published, what its status was at time of publication, and what
> the URL of the document is. The same goes for quotes where you go  
> as far
> as citing the very second the document was published.

:) not me, but HTTP, but I'll do a lighter version
The quote is automagically generated by a mailto Javascript
	See http://www.w3.org/2000/08/eb58

> Likewise, it would
> be much better if you could first state the comment and then  
> explain why
> you are proposing the change. For example:
>
>   In http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-xbl-20060907/#terminology the
>   definition of the term "XBL subtree" should be replaced by
>   "An XBL subtree is a fragment body in an XML document..." ...

Maybe not exactly like that but I can change a bit the way it is  
done. No troubles.


The rest is not for www-archive but a discussion about the comment  
which MUST go on the appropriate ML.


Best.

-- 
Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead
   QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/
      *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Thursday, 5 October 2006 07:12:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:32:58 UTC