W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > May 2006

Re: on HTTP in RDF

From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 11:55:14 +0200
Message-ID: <4472DC02.8010300@w3.org>
To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Cc: Ralph Swick <swick@w3.org>, www-archive@w3.org, Eric Prud <eric@w3.org>

Hi Dan,

Glad this caught your attention! Thanks for the pointers, in fact this work did start with EricP's work related to Annotea (as you've pointed out below). EricP preferred that we clean up the work and publish it on a better namespace. However, we were not aware on your work related to email vocabulary, we will look at that in due course.

Also thanks for your comments on the current draft. You will have noticed that it is still a very early draft that we intend to clean up in the next weeks. Please send any additional comment you may have to <public-wai-ert@w3.org>.

I'll make sure to ping you, Ralph, and EricP as soon as we have another updated draft (we did send request for review to SWIG and QA).

Regards,
  Shadi


Dan Connolly wrote:
> I just discovered this spec:
> 
> HTTP in RDF
> Editors' Draft 20 March 2006
> http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/HTTP/WD-HTTP-in-RDF-20060320
> 
> I don't see where to send feedback. Please cite/forward as appropriate.
> 
> This is interesting stuff. I've done various bits of related work.
> 
> I note the RDF Schema in section 5 gives URIs like..
>   http://www.w3.org/1999/xx/http#Request
> 
> Ralph, CVS suggests you last updated that request.
> 
> It looks like that schema in section 5 would be a good update.
> 
> In this case, I doubt the editors meant what this says:
> 
> <rdf:Property rdf:about="&http-ns;allow">
>   <rdfs:label xml:lang="en">Allow</rdfs:label>
>   <rdfs:comment>The Allow header</rdfs:comment>
>   <rdfs:subPropertyOf rdf:resource="&http-ns;header"/>
>   <rdfs:domain rdf:resource="&http-ns;Request"/>
>   <rdfs:domain rdf:resource="&http-ns;Response"/>
> </rdf:Property>
> 
> that says that everything with an allow property is both a Request
> _and_ a Response. See
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfs-domain-and-range
> 
> 
> Hmm... I also see http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/HTTP/WD-RFC822-in-RDF-20060216 ;
> I don't care for the name/value approach there.
> You might be interested in some work I've done...
>   http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/pim/email
> and related work...
>   http://esw.w3.org/topic/EmailVocabulary
> 

-- 
Shadi Abou-Zahra     Web Accessibility Specialist for Europe | 
Chair & Staff Contact for the Evaluation and Repair Tools WG | 
World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)           http://www.w3.org/ | 
Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI),   http://www.w3.org/WAI/ | 
WAI-TIES Project,                http://www.w3.org/WAI/TIES/ | 
Evaluation and Repair Tools WG,    http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/ | 
2004, Route des Lucioles - 06560,  Sophia-Antipolis - France | 
Voice: +33(0)4 92 38 50 64          Fax: +33(0)4 92 38 78 22 | 
Received on Tuesday, 23 May 2006 09:55:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:32:52 UTC