- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 16:04:59 +0100
- To: shadi@w3.org, Ralph Swick <swick@w3.org>
- Cc: www-archive@w3.org, Eric Prud <eric@w3.org>
I just discovered this spec: HTTP in RDF Editors' Draft 20 March 2006 http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/HTTP/WD-HTTP-in-RDF-20060320 I don't see where to send feedback. Please cite/forward as appropriate. This is interesting stuff. I've done various bits of related work. I note the RDF Schema in section 5 gives URIs like.. http://www.w3.org/1999/xx/http#Request Ralph, CVS suggests you last updated that request. It looks like that schema in section 5 would be a good update. In this case, I doubt the editors meant what this says: <rdf:Property rdf:about="&http-ns;allow"> <rdfs:label xml:lang="en">Allow</rdfs:label> <rdfs:comment>The Allow header</rdfs:comment> <rdfs:subPropertyOf rdf:resource="&http-ns;header"/> <rdfs:domain rdf:resource="&http-ns;Request"/> <rdfs:domain rdf:resource="&http-ns;Response"/> </rdf:Property> that says that everything with an allow property is both a Request _and_ a Response. See http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfs-domain-and-range Hmm... I also see http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/HTTP/WD-RFC822-in-RDF-20060216 ; I don't care for the name/value approach there. You might be interested in some work I've done... http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/pim/email and related work... http://esw.w3.org/topic/EmailVocabulary -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Monday, 22 May 2006 15:05:18 UTC