Re: comments on pubrules

On Mon, 2006-03-27 at 13:34 +0200, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> According to http://validator.w3.org/checklink the pubrules document  
> http://www.w3.org/2005/07/13-pubrules-src.html has quite some broken links  
> (and fragment identifiers). I believe most, if not all, are in the  
> examples. Now pubrules itself is not a document on the TR track, but it  
> would be nice if it sets a good example.

Of course we'll fix the broken links.

> It also appears http://www.w3.org/2005/07/pubrules and  
> http://www.w3.org/2005/07/pubrules?uimode=filter&uri= don't validate due  
> to namespace declarations that are likely ignored given that the documents  
> have text/html as media type.

I believe we are serving them as text/html because of some rendering
issues.

 - Ian

-- 
Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org)   http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
Tel:                     +1 718 260-9447