W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > March 2006

comments on pubrules

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 13:34:09 +0200
To: w3t-comm@w3.org
Cc: "www-archive@w3.org" <www-archive@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.s62k27jt64w2qv@id-c0020.oslo.opera.com>

According to http://validator.w3.org/checklink the pubrules document  
http://www.w3.org/2005/07/13-pubrules-src.html has quite some broken links  
(and fragment identifiers). I believe most, if not all, are in the  
examples. Now pubrules itself is not a document on the TR track, but it  
would be nice if it sets a good example.

It also appears http://www.w3.org/2005/07/pubrules and  
http://www.w3.org/2005/07/pubrules?uimode=filter&uri= don't validate due  
to namespace declarations that are likely ignored given that the documents  
have text/html as media type.

Anne van Kesteren
Received on Monday, 27 March 2006 11:34:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:32:49 UTC