- From: WBS Mailer on behalf of <swh@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2006 11:10:02 +0000
- To: www-archive@w3.org
Here are the answers submitted to 'SPARQL Next Steps Discussion' (the public) for Stephen Harris. --------------------------------- Other Issues ---- What additional issues/missing features should factor into rechartering discussions? according to this questionaire, priorities so far seem to be: * protocol for graph update * querying collections * aggregate functions * subqueries * told bNodes * standardized approach to "fourth slot" queries ala RDQL * using SPARQL via forms languages such as HTML or XForms feature 1: protocol for graph update feature 2: told bNodes feature 3: --------------------------------- Priorities ---- What issues/features are most important to you? Comments (or a URI pointing to your comments): update is the most critical for me, but I'm allready having to use told bnodes, so a standardisation of that would be good --------------------------------- Attend F2F ---- Will you attend the DAWG face to face at the 2006 TP? (See also, the Registration for Technical Plenary.) [ Yes, both 2 March and 3 March ] --------------------------------- Demos ---- What SPARQL demos would you like to show at the meeting? Comments (or a URI pointing to your comments): These answers were last modified on 2 March 2006 at 11:05:17 U.T.C. by Stephen Harris Answers to this questionnaire can be set and changed at http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/1/DAWGnextSteps/ until 2007-03-01. Regards, The Automatic WBS Mailer
Received on Thursday, 2 March 2006 11:10:04 UTC