W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > March 2006

[wbs] response to 'SPARQL Next Steps Discussion'

From: WBS Mailer on behalf of <webmaster@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2006 11:10:02 +0000
To: www-archive@w3.org
Message-Id: <wbs-6927502a537c43328fe23fc31eb8730a@cgi.w3.org>

Here are the answers submitted to 'SPARQL Next Steps Discussion' (the
public) for Stephen Harris.

Other Issues
What additional issues/missing features should factor into rechartering

according to this questionaire, priorities so far seem to be:

   * protocol for graph update
   * querying collections
   * aggregate functions
   * subqueries
   * told bNodes
   * standardized approach to "fourth slot" queries ala RDQL
   * using SPARQL via forms languages such as HTML or XForms

feature 1: protocol for graph update
feature 2: told bNodes
feature 3: 

What issues/features are most important to you?

Comments (or a URI pointing to your comments): 
update is the most critical for me, but I'm allready having to use told
bnodes, so a standardisation of that would be good

Attend F2F
Will you attend the DAWG face to face at the 2006 TP? (See also, the
Registration for Technical Plenary.)

[ Yes, both 2 March and 3 March ] 

What SPARQL demos would you like to show at the meeting?

Comments (or a URI pointing to your comments): 

These answers were last modified on 2 March 2006 at 11:05:17 U.T.C.
by Stephen Harris

Answers to this questionnaire can be set and changed at
http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/1/DAWGnextSteps/ until 2007-03-01.


 The Automatic WBS Mailer
Received on Thursday, 2 March 2006 11:10:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:32:49 UTC