- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 08:33:45 -0400
- To: "Joe Gregorio" <joe.gregorio@gmail.com>
- Cc: www-archive@w3.org, httplib2-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
On Apr 26, 2006, at 10:16 PM, Joe Gregorio wrote: > Dan, > I'm not quite sure I understand what you are trying to > accomplish with that patch. The idea of how it works > now is if _entry_disposition returns FRESH but there > is no cache entry then a 504 is returned. Do you have > test case or site where that fails? I neglected to capture the test details; maybe I can reconstruct it. But what actually happens on a cache miss is not a 504 but a python stacktrace. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Thursday, 27 April 2006 12:33:29 UTC