- From: Joe Gregorio <joe.gregorio@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 15:13:01 -0400
- To: "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: httplib2-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net, www-archive@w3.org
On 4/19/06, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org> wrote: > If I implement max-stale, any chance you'll reconsider that > design decision? Or will I have to maintain a fork? I will accept a patch to incorporate max-stale. You're timing is impeccable since I just today discovered a situation where I may need max-stale myself :) > Any suggestions on getting wikipedia to change their caching > policy? Seems to me that no cache-control header at all > is The Right Thing for them, no? Given how rapidly I've seen their pages changes when a topic is hot I'm not so sure what their caching policy should be. -joe -- Joe Gregorio http://bitworking.org
Received on Wednesday, 19 April 2006 19:13:08 UTC