- From: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 17:27:21 +0100
- To: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>, www-validator@w3.org, feedvalidator users <feedvalidator-users@lists.sourceforge.net>, www-archive@w3.org
On 11/28/05, Olivier Thereaux <ot@w3.org> wrote: > The CSS and Feed services at W3C have very similar SOAP interfaces, with > the one for the Markup Validator coming with next release. All three > (will/do) come with at least a perl library to quickly build apps. > > http://validator-jp.w3.org/feed/docs/api.html > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-validator/2005Oct/0092.html > (doc for CSS validator coming soon) > > Does that (even partially) answer your request? A little, thanks. Doesn't look like I can be as lazy as I hoped, and that 30+ lines of SOAP is wasted on me, all I'm after is "pass" or "fail". Such a result will be enough for the simple indicator. I suppose there's always XPath (or regexp ;-) I imagine there are timeline-based QA uses for a description of the problem in a machine-readable form, but what I personally need if the response is in the negative is help to fix the problem asap. A link to human-readable information on the nature of the error would suffice (i.e. the usual check URI, which probably wouldn't change over time). Cheers, Danny. -- http://dannyayers.com
Received on Monday, 28 November 2005 16:27:42 UTC