W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > May 2005

Re: spruced up definitions

From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 14:38:53 +0100
Message-ID: <42932E6D.6050105@hp.com>
To: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
CC: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, www-archive@w3.org, "Eric Prud'hommeaux" <eric@w3.org>, Bijan Parsia <bparsia@isr.umd.edu>

Thanks for the comments and rewokred definitions.

I'll process them, send you an updated set of definitions as well as send any
questions I have.

One question for now - if we go with "subgraph", is there any reason why the
predicate should not be a blank node?


Pat Hayes wrote:
> See http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes/TEMP/DEFS_pat-1.html  Not fully 
> complete, questions in red.
> Pat
Received on Tuesday, 24 May 2005 13:39:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:32:43 UTC