Re: spruced up definitions

Thanks for the comments and rewokred definitions.

I'll process them, send you an updated set of definitions as well as send any
questions I have.

One question for now - if we go with "subgraph", is there any reason why the
predicate should not be a blank node?

	Andy

Pat Hayes wrote:
> See http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes/TEMP/DEFS_pat-1.html  Not fully 
> complete, questions in red.
> 
> Pat
> 

Received on Tuesday, 24 May 2005 13:39:38 UTC